The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > Conflict posts > Enduring Freedom

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-12-2009, 06:36 AM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
Administrator
 

Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 46,798
Distinctions
Special Projects VOM Staff Contributor 
Default New U.S. general looks to shift tack in Afghanistan

LONDON (Reuters) – The United States plans to review tactics in Afghanistan in response to widespread anger about the high number of civilian casualties, the newly appointed U.S. commander said in comments broadcast on Friday.

Speaking after his confirmation by the U.S. Senate, Lieutenant General Stanley McChrystal said his focus would be balancing the "short-term tactical impact" of operations with the "long-term strategic effect," emphasizing that protecting the population was central to getting the balance right.

"One of the things we will do is review all of our rules of engagement and all the instructions to our units, with the emphasis that we are fighting for the population and that involves protecting them both from the enemy and from unintended consequences of our operation," McChrystal told the BBC.

"We know that while an operation may be conducted for the right reasons, if it has negative effects it can have a negative outcome for everyone."

McChrystal, a former commander of special forces in Iraq, is due to take command of the 56,000 U.S. troops and 33,000 others from NATO countries shortly, replacing General David McKiernan, who was effectively dismissed last month.

The high level of civilian casualties from U.S. air strikes and other attacks on suspected Taliban hideouts has become an extremely sensitive issue, with Afghanistan's leaders and the local population openly critical of the U.S. military.

An air strike last month in western Afghanistan killed a large number of civilians, with the U.S. military acknowledging 20-35 killed and the Afghan government saying it was 140.

"The most important part is shielding the Afghan people so they can accept the government of Afghanistan as legitimate and effective," McChrystal said of his priorities.

"So if we win this effort, it will be because we protected the population, and going after the high-value enemy targets will just be a supporting effort to do that."

The general acknowledged that the war in Afghanistan had a long way to run. When asked if he could do with more troops, he said that no general would ever turn down extra forces. He said an overall goal would be preventing al Qaeda's re-emergence.

"The guidance that I've been given as I interpret it is to prevent both al Qaeda's re-emergence and, in this case, the Taliban taking over Afghanistan, so that we don't have safe havens inside Afghanistan in the future," he said.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
US replaces general in Afghanistan as war worsens David Enduring Freedom 0 05-11-2009 01:23 PM
'Tough year' ahead in Afghanistan: US general David Enduring Freedom 0 02-18-2009 01:52 PM
General wants U.S. troop boost in Afghanistan David Enduring Freedom 0 09-16-2008 12:22 PM
Shift in forces to Afghanistan less than requested David Enduring Freedom 0 09-09-2008 01:49 PM
Pave Tack AN/AVQ-26 David Military Weapons 0 01-11-2008 03:09 PM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.