|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Register | Video Directory | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Games | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Chat Room |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
Maggie...I do appreciate your support of the troops, but is it possible for you to talk about anything other than doom and gloom? We all have enough demons to worry about without people constantly throwing more stuff in our face all the time....
Just wondering. Trav
__________________
Godspeed and keep low! |
Sponsored Links |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
There is hope
You have a very good point. Last year I asked my pastor whether it would be better for people not to know, as the news was not good. He said, "No, they would want to know what they are dealing with."
I know I have concentrated on this a great deal, as I went on and on about already; However, the good news is that if this chemical is as harmful as I suspect, then we can keep from harming our grandmas and today's troops too by simple things like wearing goggles & chemical retardant gloves for repetitive exposures. We can inventory what we use and demand no such n-butyl ethers are withheld per proprietory excuses. We can get an accurtate diagnosis for this, with just a couple of simple of extra tests, on blood that docs take anyway. Sometimes the tests are worse than what ails one. REALLY No more pain and expense on unnecessary tests just to find out what's going on in the first place AND I do believe there is a cure; though hidden somewhere Like stopping the autoimmune function of the immune system, maybe with something as simple as a vitamin to help the cell to cell communication or other Maybe we can stop the harm to innocent babies Maybe more people will be able to have children in the first place. I can only point the finger in this direction The proof and the cures will have to come from those harmed - And when doctors take an interest in doing a little above and beyond. But, maybe, these chemicals should be banned by the US Legislature, who in my opinion is more powerful than the chemical companies. Web link of this page |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Hey Bob
Only 0.01% of hot dogs can be rat crap, hell you can hardly taste it.
Have any of your wives ever bugged you for hours over which shade of white you should paint something? I'm convinced that Bright White is rat crap free. By the time you get to Egg Shell it's about 3% poo. There's no telling how much rat crap is in Purple. I try not to think about things like that. Stay healthy, Andy |
#24
|
||||
|
||||
Andy
AW MAN!!! Now I gotta go home and repaint the living room. It's light brown, (The official color on the can was hamster brown) but first I'm gonna go to lunch and have couple of hot dogs, and to make them go down easier, Im gonna snort some PAM!!!. Bob K
__________________
Bob K. AKA bOOger God bless the ACLU |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Enjoy yourself!
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
One time, back in AF band camp, a fellow airman was sent TDY to Turkey. While there he paid a visit to a local "establishment" and came back with a nasty case of creepy, crawlies in his short curlies. Too embarrased to go to the dispensary or get something from a local pharmacy, he grabbed a can of DDT from one of our C-141's and gave that part of his anatomy a good dose of the chemical. It worked! He not only got rid of the creepy, crawlies, he also got rid of the short curlies! He also got a rather nasty rash that put him out of social condition for about 3 weeks. A harsh lesson, well learned.
__________________
I'd rather be historically accurate than politically correct. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Ouch Doc in the Navy we prefered the shaving half your patch and lighting the other half on fire and stabbing the critters with ice picks when they tried to escape. ArrrrrrrG Matty.
__________________
May you be in Heaven 3 days before the Devil knows your dead |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
DDT?
Well, I had to look it up
Now it is a pesticide (so is 2-butoxyethanol in an odd sort of way) and this is what they say about it: Quote:
http://www.valdezlink.com/inipol/pag...utoxy_msds.htm which is said NOT to bioaccummulate (But is that so?) The chemical companies lobbied EPA & the 2 year process ended a year ago. They should have been granted permission to put more 2-butoxyethanol in the air since then (remember worst exposure is in the eyes - & that the elderly & children will be most harmed) http://www.panda.org/about_wwf/what_...blems/edcs.cfm So, the main problem is that the pesticides fool the biological processess and that's why the endocrine system & hormones and everything goes high or low whether we are talking about cortisol or blood pressure or blood sugar or thyroid; get the picture? Quote:
I think it is time to see whether or not it is this chemical that harmed our soldiers in every war since WWII and our grandmas and great grandmas and the Troops today, too! Any of these health ailments for military or civilians with CFS since WWII? X This just could be the cheapest study of all; and it may tell us the most
__________________
Look into BUTYL for CFIDS, CFS, FM & 'Military Syndromes' * An e-mail request to the CDC on Flu Symptoms Traces of blood in urine? * Diarrhea then Constipation? Seizures Fainting Dizziness * |
#29
|
||||
|
||||
sn-e3,
Sounds like a typical swabbo solution to a problem.
__________________
I'd rather be historically accurate than politically correct. |
#30
|
||||
|
||||
The body has tons of chlorine. It's in sodium chloride, salt. I hate to tell you guys but the delousing powder we used in Vietnam was DDT. I caught head lice from carrying this kid around all day and used it on myself and I am fine. LOL
__________________
"Facts are stubborn things; and whatever may be our wishes, our inclination, or the dictates of our passions, they cannot alter the state of facts and evidence." John Adams |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
|