|
Home | Forums | Gallery | Register | Video Directory | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Games | Today's Posts | Search | Chat Room |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"60's Lies About Vietnam War Must Be Exposed Now"
VIETNAM VET REFORM GROUP SAYS 60'S LIES ABOUT VIETNAM WAR MUST BE EXPOSED NOW
TO DISCREDIT ACADEMIC VIEWS ON FOREIGN POLICY AND THREAT OF POLARIZATION. - a V.V.A.R. newsnote from Leonard Magruder- President (Part 2) The main focus of lying by the anti-war movement was two White Papers issued by the State Department in December l961 and March l965. The claims of these two papers, based on a great deal of evidence, were that Hanoi was directing a campaign of overt and covert subversion and aggression against an independent South Vietnam. In a sustained attack over the years, the anti-war movement claimed that the war was a civil war between "U.S. puppets" and "indigenous resistance" in South Vietnam . This denial of a North Vietnamese presence in the South was the major contention, and the biggest lie, of opponents of the war. They portrayed the two White Papers as a calculated campaign of disinformation by the U.S. Governement. Destroying the credibility of these two White Papers was the chief objective of the anti-war movment and the first step in its ultimate victory over U.S. policy. But it was done by lying, and if they do it again with regards to current U.S. policy on the war on terrorism, they will destroy the homeland. The l961 White Paper said outright and, as it turns out, correctly,"The Viet Cong are not indigenous freedom fighters; Hanoi is behind the guerrilla war in South Vietnam. The Lao Don party, that is, the Communist Party, is the vangard of the "liberation" movement." This first White Paper was the one that presented John F. Kennedy's case for assistance to South Vietnam as legal, moral, and proper. The Second White Paper, released in Februrary of l965, after Lydon Johnson took over, again made the point that the conflict was caused by Hanoi's policy of conquest. It stated, "South Vietnam is fighting for its life against a brutal campaign of terror and armed attacks inspired , directed , and controlled by the Communist regime in Hanoi. It is established beyond question that North Vietnam is carrying out a carefully conceived plan of aggression against the South... a violation of the United Nations Charter and directly contrary to the Geneva Accords to which North Vietnam is a party." The entire anti-war movement rested on the lie that North Vietnam was never involved in aggression. This was done to take the issue out of the arena of Cold War containment policy. This is what was taught to students in the notorious teach-ins at major universities. as well as spread by leading anti-war figures such as I.F.Stone, Stanton Lynd, Tom Hayden, David Dellinger, Abbie Hoffman, Francis Fitzgerald, and Hans Morganthau. Later George Kahin and John Lewis in a text that was widely used in the teach-ins ,"The United States in Vietnam", wrote, "There is no evidence to assert, as does the U.S. White Paper of 1965, that the Liberation Front for South Vietnam was formed at Hanoi's order." They completely ignored all of the evidence that went into the two White Papers. Since then, of course, we have had numerous testimonies from disenchanted leaders of the North confirming the accuracy of the White Papers, men such as Van Toai Doan, author of "The Vietnamese Gulag" and Truong Nhu Tang, author of "A Vietcong Memoir." As to the lie by the anti-war movement that the Viet Cong was an independent South Vietnamese political movement, Bui Ten, the North Vietnamese colonel who accepted the surrender of South Vietnam said in "The Wall Street Journal " recently, "It was set up by our Communist Party to implement a decision of the Third Party Congress of September 1960." But the most important confession of involvment by Hanoi is found in the report "Summary of Fact", issued in l987 by Hanoi's Military History Institute describing key decisions made by Hanoi regarding South Vietnam from the Geneva Convention in l954 until the final conquest by the Communists in l975. Stephen B. Young in an article to which I am indebted for some material in this article, summarized the impact of this material when he wrote, "The Summary confirms the two American White Papers and utterly refutes the position of the anti-war movement. Hanoi's document reveals how, step by step, the Vietnamese Communist leadership in Hanoi made the decisions to forment a war in South Vietnam and then, again and again, to escalate that conflict." From the start of South Vietnam's existence following the Geneva Conference, Hanoi was resolved to crush its autonomy and bring its people under Communist rule. Those who supported the war were never confused about this, but the lies of the anti-war movment came to be embraced by so many that the U.S. was threatened with serious internal conflict, and the flawed solution of Vietnamization offered by Nixon was accepted. The "Summary of Fact" contains this statement, "Following the road set out by the Party Congress, on December 20, l960, the People's Front for the Liberation of South Vietnam was established." That is, the NFL, or Viet Cong is thus revealed by the Summary as having been the creation of Hanoi's Communist Party. That one sentence destroys the arguments of the anti-war movement. The White Papers of 1961 and 1965 had assessed the intentions of Hanoi with complete accuracy. The credibility gap, or cynicism, of the 60's was not created by any fabrication on the part of the Kennedy or Johnson Administrations. It was created by deliberate lying by the leaders of the anti-war movement. Said Stephen B. Young in his article commenting on celebrations of the thirtieth anniversaries of the Vietnam War,"A generation congratulates itself once again for doing what the North Vietnamese never could have done -defeat the United States. History, as they say, is written by the victors, and the victor in this conflict was the American anti -war movement. It is no wonder, then , that our national recollection of the war matches that of the New Left. It is no wonder too that certain questions are no longer asked, chief among them the question, a central one thirty years ago, of whether the U.S. involvement resulted from a tissue of lies Washington was spinning out even before the Gulf of Tonkin incident, or whether its factual assessment of conditions in South Vietnam , Laos, and Cambodia and its consequent policy response to the plight of the South Vietnamese people was rational and justifiable." We now know, with much of the evidence coming from the enemy itself, that the response was rational and justifiable. Therefore, what is taught on campus about the Vietnam War can no longer be tolerated as it is largely based on lies. By far the most widely used textbook on the Vietnam War in our universities is Stanley Karnow's "Vietnam: A History." So biased is the book that when translated into a PBS series it caused protests and riots by Vietnamese refugees and Americans in New Orleans, Houston, Los Angeles, Washington, Paris, and London. A documentary , narrated by Charlton Heston was produced exposing the errors, and also a book, "Pirates are Losers." The time has unquestionably come for Vietnam veterans, who were the primary victims of this massive academic conspiracy against truth to speak out strongly in demanding that this change, and that this matter of the two White Papers and the evidence that the anti-war movement was a moral fraud, be a central part of presenting to students a new and more honest view of the Vietnam War. The only way that the American campus is going to be able to present the absolutely necessary unity with the rest of the nation that is required in the face of the terrorist crisis is to admit that it was wrong on Vietnam, admit they fell for and propagated enemy propaganda, as there are already signs that this may be happening again. As the Chief of Military History, U.S. Government wrote in his "Final Report", "If there is to be an inquiry related to the Vietnam War, it should be into the reasons why enemy propaganda was so widespread in this country, and why the enemy was able to condition the public to such an extent that the best educated segments of our population have given credence to the most incredible allegations." Sempers, Roger
__________________
IN LOVING MEMORY OF MY HUSBAND SSgt. Roger A. One Proud Marine 1961-1977 68/69 http://www.geocities.com/thedrifter001/ |
Sponsored Links |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American Legion Chief Falsely Claims HE's a "Vietnam Vet"! | Gimpy | Vietnam | 35 | 12-14-2006 01:40 PM |
" Division-sized Logistic unit " in Vietnam | mcgrunt | Marines | 7 | 10-29-2006 07:47 AM |
The "TOP TEN" Latest Lies From The "Swiftees" | Gimpy | Political Debate | 0 | 08-28-2004 02:04 PM |
Campaign "RE-DU"..Shamless Lies & Broken Promises! | Gimpy | Political Debate | 1 | 07-19-2004 12:07 PM |
Operation "Breakwind"... A Vietnam War fable | MORTARDUDE | Vietnam | 6 | 08-17-2003 09:52 PM |
|