Bush seems oddly complacent

Quotes

"Bush seems oddly complacent about the fact that one or two of his top
people may have intentionally
exposed an undercover CIA agent, compromising that agent's work,
safety and undercover contacts.
That's an incredibly serious matter, and the continued presence of
such a person in the White House
ought to worry the president immensely. The fact that the exposure was
an act of petty, mean-spirited
political revenge against a political opponent ought to outrage him,
particularly given his pledge to
restore integrity to the White House. But apparently it doesn't."
--Editorial, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Attribution
--

This is another leftist tempest in a teapot.

The government has always had information "leaks" and probably always will.

On the other hand, the leftist media is in the same sewer with these snakes,
and they obviously KNOW who leaked this data. They more than likely paid
someone for it.

If the leftist media is so patriotic, and wants to pontificate to the rest
of us, why did they print this, and why don't they now have the personal
character to stand up and tell us the truth?

The simple fact is the leftist media is composed of lazy, ignorant bums who
are totally out of control.
"whippowill" wrote in message
news:cG9wdXA=.74b4df13d9f06d562b25c7e7bc675345@106 6138659.cotse.net...
> Quotes
>
> "Bush seems oddly complacent about the fact that one or two of his top
> people may have intentionally
> exposed an undercover CIA agent, compromising that agent's work,
> safety and undercover contacts.
> That's an incredibly serious matter, and the continued presence of
> such a person in the White House
> ought to worry the president immensely. The fact that the exposure was
> an act of petty, mean-spirited
> political revenge against a political opponent ought to outrage him,
> particularly given his pledge to
> restore integrity to the White House. But apparently it doesn't."
> --Editorial, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Attribution
> --
>
>

one interesting and critical aspect of the "liberal news media" is their
coverage--or actually lack of it--with respect to issues surrounding the federal
reserve, IMF and World Bank. As the newly formed Russian state was looted and
the Russian people's savings were inflated away--ON THE EXPLICIT ADVICE OF
U.S.GOVT-DESIGNATED ECONOMISTS (following their advice was linked to U.S. aid in
the $billions) what did you see of this on the network news? Did they ever
explain who these "oligarchs" were and how they got the money? Even the usually
reliable "Frontline" documentary series (they did a killer job on the Asian
crisis in 1998, see it as pbs.org) fumbled this one away.
You could read all about it at worldnetdaily.com in "real time" thanks to the
correspondence of Anne Williamson, who was on the scence and reporting (she
managed to barge in on the Clinton admins point person in charge of disbursing
aid$ and he had no idea what to say to her). Now Ms. Williamson can't seem to
find a publisher after the one she had lined up got strangely cold feet and
pulled her contract

look at these, they're some of the most powerful "untold" stories of our
times...
..
http://www.russians.org/williamson_testimony.htm
http://www.newsmakingnews.com/catharvardcontagion.htm

nshinede@columbus.rr.com wrote:

> This is another leftist tempest in a teapot.
>
> The government has always had information "leaks" and probably always will.
>
> On the other hand, the leftist media is in the same sewer with these snakes,
> and they obviously KNOW who leaked this data. They more than likely paid
> someone for it.
>
> If the leftist media is so patriotic, and wants to pontificate to the rest
> of us, why did they print this, and why don't they now have the personal
> character to stand up and tell us the truth?
>
> The simple fact is the leftist media is composed of lazy, ignorant bums who
> are totally out of control.
> "whippowill" wrote in message
> news:cG9wdXA=.74b4df13d9f06d562b25c7e7bc675345@106 6138659.cotse.net...
> > Quotes
> >
> > "Bush seems oddly complacent about the fact that one or two of his top
> > people may have intentionally
> > exposed an undercover CIA agent, compromising that agent's work,
> > safety and undercover contacts.
> > That's an incredibly serious matter, and the continued presence of
> > such a person in the White House
> > ought to worry the president immensely. The fact that the exposure was
> > an act of petty, mean-spirited
> > political revenge against a political opponent ought to outrage him,
> > particularly given his pledge to
> > restore integrity to the White House. But apparently it doesn't."
> > --Editorial, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Attribution
> > --
> >
> >