The Patriot Files Forums  

Go Back   The Patriot Files Forums > Conflict posts > Iraqi Freedom

Post New Thread  Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-08-2004, 04:42 AM
revwardoc's Avatar
revwardoc revwardoc is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Gardner, MA
Posts: 4,252
Distinctions
Contributor VOM 
Default Pentagon to offer direct news service from Iraq and Afghanistan

http://www.wtnh.com/Global/story.asp?S=1675781

(Kuwait City, Kuwait -AP, Feb. 28, 2004 11:30 AM) _ The U.S. military will launch its own news service in Iraq and Afghanistan to send military video, text and photos directly to the Internet or news outlets.

The $6.3 million project, expected to begin operating in April, is one of the largest military public affairs projects in recent memory, and is intended to allow small media outlets in the United States and elsewhere to bypass what the Pentagon views as an increasingly combative press corps.

U.S. officials have complained that Iraq-based media focuses on catastrophic events like car bombs and soldiers' deaths, while giving short shrift to U.S. rebuilding efforts.

The American public "currently gets a pretty slanted picture," said Army Capt. Randall Baucom, a spokesman for the Kuwait-based U.S.-led Coalition Land Forces Command. "We want them to get an opportunity to see the facts as they exist, instead of getting information from people who aren't on the scene."

The project, called Digital Video and Imagery Distribution System or DVIDS, will also give the Pentagon more control of the coverage when calamities do happen.

Army camera teams will be able to use their access to battle zones or military bases to film the aftermath of rebel attacks on U.S. troops _ or U.S. raids on insurgent targets _ then offer free pictures to news outlets within two hours.

At times civilian media are kept away from such events.

"We have an unfair advantage," Baucom said. "We're going to be able to get closer to the incident and provide better spokespeople to give the right information. The important thing is that we provide the public with accurate information."

But media analysts argued that the military has a vested interest in making sure its viewpoint is heard.

"The Army wants to get their view across and they are using a technique as old as any public relations maneuver ever devised," said Aly Colon, an ethics group leader at the Poynter Institute, the journalism research and education center in St. Petersburg, Fla.

"I would view the Army's decision, in the same way that I would view OPEC creating a communications system to help the American public understand what it means when prices go up," he said.

"This is the kind of news that people get in countries where the government controls the media. Why would anybody here want to buy into it?" Mac McKerral, president of the Society of Professional Journalists, told The Associated Press.

The Army is in the midst of contracting to outfit five Mobile Public Affairs Detachments with a suitcase-sized reporting kit containing digital video and still cameras, a laptop computer and a Norsat NewsLink 3200 satellite broadcast terminal. Four teams will be based in Iraq and one in Afghanistan.

Much of the effort is aimed at packaging and shipping locally focused stories to small and medium-sized newspapers and TV stations in the United States, said Army Col. Rick Thomas, who heads the effort.

Most small U.S. media outlets can't afford to send a reporter to Iraq to cover a local military unit, Thomas said. Since the ongoing troop rotation involves several Army National Guard and Reserve units from communities across the United States, there are small media outlets who might never get news of their neighbors' work in Iraq.

"The vast majority are dependent on other news organizations to get their products," Thomas said. "We think we can give them some more focused copy. We can shoot video of someone from, say, Tupelo, Miss., and they've got what looks like a very good hometown piece."

The military brass was surprised and impressed with the speed and immediacy of the coverage of journalists embedded with U.S. combat units during the war, and wanted to develop the same capabilities, Thomas said.

Television crews demonstrated their equipment for Army public affairs teams, and Thomas said his staff compiled a list of equipment needed to cover breaking news.

The Army already has dozens of its own reporters in Iraq and Afghanistan writing for internal newsletters and magazines. Thomas said he hopes civilian media can reuse the same stories, or at least the Army's photos and video.

The military's reporters will transmit their stories and video to servers at Third Army headquarters in Atlanta, and allow access to them over a password-protected Internet site, Baucom said. Accredited news organizations will be allowed to register for free access, he said.

Thomas said the military also plans to use the equipment for internal video, such as beaming pictures from an aircraft's gun camera to a Pentagon briefing.

The DVIDS units will also make it easier to get positive stories published, Thomas said.

"There are numerous good news stories that aren't told that do provide a better balance on the overall successes we achieved in Iraq," he said. "We'll be able to provide the option for those types of stories. They're not going to lead in a major daily newspaper, but they'll play well in smaller daily papers and especially weekly papers."

__________________
I'd rather be historically accurate than politically correct.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
  #2  
Old 03-08-2004, 05:30 AM
catman's Avatar
catman catman is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 2,907
Send a message via ICQ to catman Send a message via Yahoo to catman
Distinctions
Contributor VOM 
Default

Wonder why they did not do this from the beginning?

Trav
__________________

Godspeed and keep low!
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-08-2004, 12:39 PM
revwardoc's Avatar
revwardoc revwardoc is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Gardner, MA
Posts: 4,252
Distinctions
Contributor VOM 
Default

Catman,

Beats me. Personally I wouldn't trust any member of the press as far as I could throw him!
__________________
I'd rather be historically accurate than politically correct.
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-08-2004, 02:31 PM
catman's Avatar
catman catman is offline
Senior Member
 

Join Date: Dec 1969
Location: Frisco, TX
Posts: 2,907
Send a message via ICQ to catman Send a message via Yahoo to catman
Distinctions
Contributor VOM 
Default

Same-same here doc. They are right up there with divorce lawyers and ambulance chasers as far as I am concerned.

Trav
__________________

Godspeed and keep low!
sendpm.gif Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Good News From Afghanistan vol.17: Sept 27/05 David Enduring Freedom 0 10-04-2005 05:47 AM
Good news from Afghanistan, Sep. 8th, 2005 David Enduring Freedom 0 09-08-2005 10:39 PM
SpaceWar Express News Service and... USNLSC Warfare 0 08-13-2004 04:34 AM
Pentagon Warned Halliburton-KBR On "Dirty" Food Service MORTARDUDE General Posts 0 12-16-2003 10:36 PM
No pay cut for troops in Iraq, Afghanistan-Pentagon thedrifter Marines 0 08-16-2003 05:04 AM

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.