Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size
Login

Military Photos



Current poll results


Should homeland defense be a permanent mission for the Guard and Reserve?

Yes78 %78 %78 % 78.41 % (385)
No14 %14 %14 % 14.87 % (73)
I do not know4 %4 %4 % 4.68 % (23)
I have no opinion0 %0 %0 % 0.20 % (1)
Other, please list in comments1 %1 %1 % 1.83 % (9)

Total votes: 491
One vote is allowed per day

[ Voting booth | Other polls ]

Comments

Display Order
Re: Should homeland defense be a permanent mission for the G
by SEATJERKER
on Jul 15, 2002
As the state's militia, the Guard should be available for the governor's call when needed for state duty, such as disaster relief etc. If there was a short-term requirement, obviously they could be called up by the CinC, but I see homeland defense as a long-term issue. And
homeland defense is a national matter, best dealt with at the federal level. This indeed is one of the legitimate functions of the federal government. The jursidictional disputes that could arise with the Guard involved would only further weaken our defenses.

Re: Should homeland defense be a permanent mission for the G
by Anonymous
on Jul 15, 2002

My son is in the Guard and I know there are many soldiers who would love to be on active duty without leaving home. These soldiers could be federalized and used to supplement homeland defense. They might even free up regular active duty soldiers and airmen for other assignments. My experience in the reserve leads me to believe that the same is true in that instance. With the reserves, we could also use sailors and marines. I think it's a great idea which I readily support.


Re: Should homeland defense be a permanent mission for the G
by Anonymous
on Jul 17, 2002

the gaurd and reserve are part time . a full time service should be born. with the possibility of short term help from the reserve and gaurd.


Re: Should homeland defense be a permanent mission for the G
by Anonymous
on Jul 17, 2002

Not only must we have Homeland Defense as a permanent mission of the Guard and Reserves AND the Coast Guard, but the "Defense Department" should go back to being titled the "War Department" if our services are going to continue being expected to risk their lives all over the world! I'd like to see the FBI, FAA and ATF part of Homeland Defense permanently too.


Re: Should homeland defense be a permanent mission for the G
by Anonymous
on Jul 18, 2002
The Guard and Reserve should remain in thier pre 9/11 status. There is a protocol for the Guard and Reserve, and it should be used as planned. We as a nation that has fought for our freedom, and self preservation enough to know that you don't change horses in the middle of the stream. The system that has governed our Guard and Reserve units have worked well in the past, let's leave it that way. This is the first real war on american soil since the 1860's, so it will take a little geting used to, however if everyone just does his/hers job. Then all will be well if we practice what we have preached over the last 200 + years

Respectfully,
Larry M. Easton Sr.

Re: Should homeland defense be a permanent mission for the G
by Anonymous
on Jul 24, 2002

With respect, there have been a number of real shooting wars on american soil prior to and following the 1860s. One can name the Indian Wars out west and military actions which involved tribal peoples all across the nation. Long before our War of Rebellion we experienced the Whiskey Rebellion which much changed our democracy. Several times in the 20th century we suffered when military action was called forth to challenge labor disputes, and even freedom of assembly and speech protesting foreign undeclared war. The Civil Rights movement experienced numerous armed conflicts between citizens and military forces. The attack upon Pearl Harbor was seen by government as a direct attack upon the sovereignty of the United States itself, as have been other armed skirmishes on protectorates of the american government in other decades. During WW II it is often forgotten that about 400 of our ships were sunk in sight of american shores by Nazi U-boats. So, indeed these and other examples would suggest a serious need to prudently rethink, reconfigure and reform our domestic defense plan and forces which has long been neglected.


Only logged in users are allowed to comment. register/log in
Military History
Forum Posts

Military Polls

Is America's military (1.4 million active and 1.3 million Guard/Reserve) too big or too small?

[ Results | Polls ]

Votes: 148

This Day in History
1865: General William T. Sherman begins a march through the Carolinas.

1940: Hitler cancels an attack in the West due to bad weather and the capture of German attack plans in Belgium.

1942: Japans advance into Burma begins.

1944: The U.S. First and Third armies link up at Houffalize, effectively ending the Battle of the Bulge.

1944: Eisenhower assumes supreme command of the Allied Expeditionary Force in Europe.

1945: Adolf Hitler takes to his underground bunker, where he remains for 105 days until he commits suicide.

1952: Knowing the requirements of the Korean war firsthand, General Earle E. Partridge, former Fifth Air Force Commander, put the full resources of the USAF Air Research and Development Command into searching for ways to increase the performance of the F-86 Sabre during this period. This top-priority effort led to the improved wing design "F" model that entered service with the 51st Wing in August 1952. The aircrafts operating altitude increased to 52,000 feet and its maximum speed went to Mach 1.05. In addition, the F-86F could make tighter turns at high altitudes.

1964: President Johnson approves Oplan 34A, operations to be conducted by South Vietnamese forces supported by the United States to gather intelligence and conduct sabotage to destabilize the North Vietnamese regime.

1969: An agreement is reached in Paris for the opening of expanded peace talks. It was agreed that representatives of the United States, South Vietnam, North Vietnam, and the National Liberation Front would sit at a circular table without nameplates, flags or markings.

1990: In the wake of vicious fighting between Armenian and Azerbaijani forces in Azerbaijan, the Soviet government sends in 11,000 troops to quell the conflict.