Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size

Military Photos

Current poll results

Is today's military stretched too thin to be effective?

Yes60 %60 %60 % 60.82 % (59)
No31 %31 %31 % 31.96 % (31)
I do not know5 %5 %5 % 5.15 % (5)
I have no opinion0 %0 %0 % 0.00 % (0)
Other, please list in comments2 %2 %2 % 2.06 % (2)

Total votes: 97
One vote is allowed per day

[ Voting booth | Other polls ]


Display Order
Re: Is today's military stretched too thin to be effective?
by Anonymous
on Jan 25, 2004
Depends on how many new fronts get opened up, by us or by others, no?

On the other hand, it'd be difficult to recall (as far as I know of) a nation which is as militarized as America is today... taking ALL police, military reserves & guard, militia, ROTC, security guards, hunters, law enforcement (like ATF, FBI etc.), intel gathering agencies, veteran organizations, customs, border patrol, private eyes, airport screeners, concealed carry permittees and ADDING them to the active duty Marines, Air, Coast Guard, Navy and Army... it makes for quite an enormous at-the-ready force. Push come to shove, and the right leader at that moment in time, my hunch is that we'd have more barrels pointed in the right direction than would truly be necessary... at least here at home.

And, as some have stated elsewhere, if they really need some help, they could just let us old fogey's re-up to handle the behind scenes duty and free up fighters.

Re: Is today's military stretched too thin to be effective?
by Anonymous
on Jan 26, 2004
There's something to be said for spreading forces, so long as there is an adequate supply line and the backfilling of deployed forces is maintained. Just as we preposition war-ready materiels in places like Diego Garcia for more rapid reaction, having troops in potential hot spots can, if used wisely in combat mobility mode, act as an enhancement to any quick reaction force. It can allow you to get there "Firstest with the mostest," as NB Forrest noted. And first with the most usually controls the field of battle.


Only logged in users are allowed to comment. register/log in
Military History
Forum Posts

Military Polls

Admin/Moderators of the PatriotFiles should

[ Results | Polls ]

Votes: 71

This Day in History
1563: The Peace of Amboise is signed granting rights to the Huguenots.

1571: Spanish troops occupy Manila.

1865: Confederate General Joseph Johnston makes a desperate attempt to stop Union General William T. Shermans drive through the Carolinas in the wars last days, but Johnstons motley army cannot stop the advance of Shermans mighty army.

1903: The U.S. Senate ratifies the Cuban treaty, gaining naval bases in Guantanamo and Bahia Honda.

1916: The First Aerosquadron takes off from Columbus, NM to join Gen. John J. Pershing and his Punitive Expedition against Pancho Villa in Mexico.

1917: The U.S. Navy Department authorizes the enrollment of women in the Naval Reserve.

1920: The U.S. Senate rejects the Treaty of Versailles for a second time refusing to ratify the League of Nations covenant.

1924: U.S. troops are rushed to Tegucigalpa as rebel forces take the Honduran capital.

1928: Marine planes bombed a bandit group at Nueva Segovia, Nicaragua.

1935: The British fire on 20,000 Muslims in India, killing 23.