Re: The fighting side of Me

John‰]
wrote:

> In article
> ,
> Pudding Tame wrote:
>
> > John‰]
> > wrote:
> >
> > > In article
> > > ,
> > > Pudding Tame wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, Lee Parsons used His
> > > > free speech and puked:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 13:43:45 GMT, tlacombe@shentel.net (Tom
> > > > Lacombe)
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >I think the Dixie Chicks, went way too far, but I would defend
> > > > their
> > > > >right to free speech.
> > > >
> > > > >That whole argument about stifling their free speech is plain
> > > > >silly.
> > > > >Of course they can say whatever they want.
> > > > >And no one is *required* to buy their records or concert
> > > > >tickets;
> > > > >people have the right to choose who they listen to and who they
> > > > >don't.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > T>his Hollywood liberal crap about public response "having a
> > > > >chilling
> > > > >effect on free speech" is bullshit. It's called using your right
> > > > >to
> > > > >free speech and taking the non-consitution-related lumps for
> > > > >your own
> > > > >actions.
> > > >
> > > > Yea right parsons: Better wake up.
> > > > --------------
> > > >
> > > > Entertainer banned after Bush remark
> > > >
> > >
> > > Not real bright are you?
> >
> > >
> > > The foregoing can be found in any junior high civics textbook; look it
> > > up.
> >
> > I see You missed the point of these posts John‰], it is "having a
> > chilling effect on free speech" and will continue to do so.
> > But, You would know that wouldnt You? ;-)
>
>
> My free speech is utterly unrestricted.
>
> If yours is chilled, the "problem" exists entirely in your mind.
>
> There is not sufficient space here to go into the myriad of problems
> that exist in your mind....

ICTLAKYFRDAOD!!
--