Hello, Ed! And thank you for sharing that!

On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:49:18 GMT, in talk.politics.guns "Yardpilot"
wrote:

>
>"His Terrible Swift Sword" wrote in message
>news4jd20d1s10d99cphr9jpqohl38dc8fgl0@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 22:42:36 GMT, in talk.politics.guns "Yardpilot"
>> wrote:
>>
>> >> First, we simply must agree that we'll have a civil conversation. If
>> >> past experience holds, your approach seems to be "refuting" someone by
>> >> name calling as demonstrated in your above sentence. I do not fool
>> >> with those. I will put effort into my task and take it seriously; I
>> >> expect the same from you.
>> >
>> >You are so full of shit on this. You bang out unsupported bullshit, you
>lie
>> >about what you post, then you expect civility?
>> >
>> >>
>> >> Next, you'll need to read Lott's book. (Please signal me when you
>> >> have done that.)
>> >
>> >Go fuck yourself, moron...
>>
>> Darn it! I believe that I just heard a discouraging word! (I just
>> *hate* it when that happens.) That would seldom be the case if I were
>> back home on the range, I say.
>>
>> I take it that this means you're not going to read Lott.
>
>So, you're another lying, shiteating troll clone. Nothing new or original
>about scumsucking assholes like you.

I say! Maybe Ed is shy or perhaps he just doesn't care for me. Go
ahead, sir... don't spare my feelings. You simply must get it out of
your system and deal with your repressed hostility! Just share your
true feelings with us. You're among friends here.

Jones

"His Terrible Swift Sword" wrote in message
news:ft1e20130i91qtj56sedn2m02c7qobgmvv@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:49:18 GMT, in talk.politics.guns "Yardpilot"
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"His Terrible Swift Sword" wrote in message
> >news4jd20d1s10d99cphr9jpqohl38dc8fgl0@4ax.com...
> >> On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 22:42:36 GMT, in talk.politics.guns "Yardpilot"
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> First, we simply must agree that we'll have a civil conversation.
If
> >> >> past experience holds, your approach seems to be "refuting" someone
by
> >> >> name calling as demonstrated in your above sentence. I do not fool
> >> >> with those. I will put effort into my task and take it seriously; I
> >> >> expect the same from you.
> >> >
> >> >You are so full of shit on this. You bang out unsupported bullshit,
you
> >lie
> >> >about what you post, then you expect civility?
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Next, you'll need to read Lott's book. (Please signal me when you
> >> >> have done that.)
> >> >
> >> >Go fuck yourself, moron...
> >>
> >> Darn it! I believe that I just heard a discouraging word! (I just
> >> *hate* it when that happens.) That would seldom be the case if I were
> >> back home on the range, I say.
> >>
> >> I take it that this means you're not going to read Lott.
> >
> >So, you're another lying, shiteating troll clone. Nothing new or original
> >about scumsucking assholes like you.
>
> I say!

No, you just whine, spin, and lie. Typical lamer. Your sort has simply never
had occasion to grow up.

On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 08:03:01 GMT, in talk.politics.guns "Yardpilot"
wrote:

>> >> >Go fuck yourself, moron...
>> >>
>> >> Darn it! I believe that I just heard a discouraging word! (I just
>> >> *hate* it when that happens.) That would seldom be the case if I were
>> >> back home on the range, I say.
>> >>
>> >> I take it that this means you're not going to read Lott.
>> >
>> >So, you're another lying, shiteating troll clone. Nothing new or original
>> >about scumsucking assholes like you.
>>
>> I say!
>
>No, you just whine, spin, and lie. Typical lamer. Your sort has simply never
>had occasion to grow up.

I'm trying to be serious, Ed. You did post to me, did you not? And,
in that posting, did you or did you not ask me to write a logical
proof? In order to do that, don't we first have to agree on exactly
what a "proof" is so that you'll be able to recognize one when you see
it?

This is how logical, forensic writing usually works, sir. One starts
with a set of premises and proceeds by a series of steps to a
conclusion. Now, if you don't accept my premises, then you won't
accept my conclusion.

Thus, what brought on this embarrassing diatribe, was that I asked if
you accepted my premises. Don't you think it a tad bit less than
completely honest to demand proof and then to refuse to address the
premises? Which one of them gives you such a problem? (Remember,
you're the one demanding " *PROOF*!!! " )

Jones

"His Terrible Swift Sword" wrote in message
news:ft1e20130i91qtj56sedn2m02c7qobgmvv@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 03:49:18 GMT, in talk.politics.guns "Yardpilot"
> wrote:
>
> >
> >"His Terrible Swift Sword" wrote in message
> >news4jd20d1s10d99cphr9jpqohl38dc8fgl0@4ax.com...
> >> On Sun, 08 Feb 2004 22:42:36 GMT, in talk.politics.guns "Yardpilot"
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> First, we simply must agree that we'll have a civil conversation.
If
> >> >> past experience holds, your approach seems to be "refuting" someone
by
> >> >> name calling as demonstrated in your above sentence. I do not fool
> >> >> with those. I will put effort into my task and take it seriously; I
> >> >> expect the same from you.
> >> >
> >> >You are so full of shit on this. You bang out unsupported bullshit,
you
> >lie
> >> >about what you post, then you expect civility?
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> Next, you'll need to read Lott's book. (Please signal me when you
> >> >> have done that.)
> >> >
> >> >Go fuck yourself, moron...
> >>
> >> Darn it! I believe that I just heard a discouraging word! (I just
> >> *hate* it when that happens.) That would seldom be the case if I were
> >> back home on the range, I say.
> >>
> >> I take it that this means you're not going to read Lott.
> >
> >So, you're another lying, shiteating troll clone. Nothing new or original
> >about scumsucking assholes like you.
>
> I say! Maybe Ed is shy or perhaps he just doesn't care for me. Go
> ahead, sir... don't spare my feelings. You simply must get it out of
> your system and deal with your repressed hostility! Just share your
> true feelings with us. You're among friends here.
>
> Jones

Well, I was wondering when you were going to come clean. You're an admitted
lieing saclk of shit troll who keeps changing his name to avoid killfiles.

On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 13:06:32 GMT, in talk.politics.guns "Morton Davis"
wrote:

>Well, I was wondering when you were going to come clean. You're an admitted
>lieing saclk of shit troll who keeps changing his name to avoid killfiles.
>

How many ways have you < plonked > me, Mort? Let me count the ways...

hee hee hee...

Jones