How could you believe this smeared campaign?

>>>By Adoph Al Franken
Kerry just wanted his piece of the pie. He cashed in by smaearing ALL
Vietnam Vets to get elected to Congress. As he stepped on the bodies
of dead Vietnam Vets - he moved to the Senate.
>>>
http://andromeda.rutgers.edu/~hbf/nation.htm

How could you say that when there were more than half a million Vietnam Vets
at the Mall in 1971 with John Kerry voicing the same opposition of U.S
involvement in Vietnam? You are, and not John Kerry is stepping on not on
the bodies of Vietnam vets, but on their beliefs that the America Vietnam
vets died fighting for is not the America their fathers and grandfathers
died fight for.

>>>
As chairman of the Select Committee, Kerry proved himself to be a
masterful chameleon portraying to the public at large what appeared to
be an unbiased approach to resolving the POW/MIA issue.
But, in reality, no one in the United States Senate pushed harder to
bury the POW/MIA issue, the last obstacle preventing normalization of
relations with Hanoi, than John Forbes Kerry.
>>>>

Can you please point out a specific incident which you think John Kerry was
not trying hard enough to result the MIA issue?

http://www.pacom.mil/leadership/j0/j0bio.shtml

http://www.abc.net.au/ra/newstories/...es_1041558.htm
On normalization of relations with Vietnam, if you think John Kerry 's push
to normalize economic relations with Vietnam is bad, then George W. Bush's
push to have military to military relations with Vietnam much be worst
according to your logic right? However, how come I don't hear your complain
about that? This weekend U.S pacific command Thomas Fargo is due to visit
Vietnam to talk with its military leaders about further military coopration.
Admiral Thomas is the U.S military representative for collective defense
arrangements in the Pacifics, meaning he can arrange a collective defense
with your enemy (vietnam) through possible leasing of military bases, arms
sales, and military excercises. It is to be the second visit to Vietnam by
the highest level pacific command to Vietnam is less than 2 years, and there
is now u.s defense attache representives in Hanoi

"unknown" wrote in message news:...
> >>>By Adoph Al Franken
> Kerry just wanted his piece of the pie. He cashed in by smaearing ALL
> Vietnam Vets to get elected to Congress. As he stepped on the bodies
> of dead Vietnam Vets - he moved to the Senate.

Kerry even wrote a book where he called them baby killers.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...&category=1127


More on Kerry's hero & boss after Vietnam - Hanoi Jane:

http://www.snopes.com/military/fonda.htm

"To add insult to injury, when American POWs finally began to return
home (some of them having been held captive for up to nine years) and
describe the tortures they had endured at the hands of the North
Vietnamese, Jane Fonda quickly told the country that they should "not
hail the POWs as heroes, because they are hypocrites and liars." Fonda
said the idea that the POWs she had met in Vietnam had been tortured
was "laughable," claiming: "These were not men who had been tortured.
These were not men who had been starved. These were not men who had
been brainwashed." The POWs who said they had been tortured were
"exaggerating, probably for their own self-interest," she asserted.
She told audiences that "Never in the history of the United States
have POWs come home looking like football players. These football
players are no more heroes than Custer was. They're military
careerists and professional killers" who are "trying to make
themselves look self-righteous, but they are war criminals according
to law."