Time to Roll Back Veterans Benefits and Military Retirmemen Costs

In yesterdays report to Congress, the proposal by the Federal Reserve
Chairman to reduce the federal defecate by eliminating Veterans Benefits and
Military Retirement payments was not as well reported as the proposal to
eliminate Social Security.

But on page 17 of his report to Congress, which is published in the
Congressional Record, Chairman Alan Greenspan clearly stated that Veterans
Benefits and Military Retirement Payment costs are "a future time economic
timebomb waiting to explode in the face or our struggling economy". He goes
on to say "future growth trends, when amatorized over economic forecasting
modles which include the modalities and mortality projections of longevity
for the classification and subclassification studies involving the targeted
and marginal targeted groups clearly show a upward trend toward increased
demographic projected requirements for primary and secondary application and
request for primary, secondary and tercurary service that clearly cannot be
sustained unless there is a subjective application of studies to determine
the effects of current programs projections with future statically
modalities".

He then goes on to say "not having had the good fortune to have had the
opportunity to be included in one of the demographic groupings given the
good fortune to have had opportunity to be included in the demographic group
that had the good fortune and had the opportunity to be included in the
demographic group that was chosen to be the group that had the opportunity
to be included in one of the groups that were chosen to serve, I can look at
this issue from a subjective prospective and determine in a subjective
manner the due course for future projections and applications based on the
application of modality tends and forecasts".

We better start writing our Congressmen and Congresswomen, quick. Looks
like we're the next target

--
If you get what you want, what's to stop you
from asking for more?

If you want some credibility, you need to stop posting stuff that contains
quotes from supposedly educated people that contain so many misspelled words
that hardly any high school graduate couldn't do a better job of spelling. The
report you quoted looks like it came from a bunch of kids in grade school who
haven't yet learned how to spell "cat" without using a "k".

What am I talking about?

How about using the word "defecate" (which means to shit) instead of "deficit"?
How about "amatorized" (which isn't even in my dictionary in any form) instead
of "amortized"?
How about "tercurary" (which also isn't in my dictionary) instead of "tertiary"?
How about "statically" instead of "statistically"?

That's just spelling errors.

Then you get into the second paragraph that includes the following:

"not having had the good fortune to have had the
opportunity to be included in one of the demographic groupings given the
good fortune to have had opportunity to be included in the demographic group
that had the good fortune and had the opportunity to be included in the
demographic group that was chosen to be the group that had the opportunity
to be included in one of the groups....."

That's a bunch of meaningless gobbledegook that no member of the Fed would ever
let get into a piece of correspondence going anywhere away from his desk.

Then you get into people allegedly using language that they clearly don't
understand and have misused.

This is clearly the product of a bunch of intellectual children who put together
stuff they didn't even understand themselves in the hopes that we're all so dumb
as to think that it came out of the Federal Reserve Board.

In short, a total bunch of childish bullshit. Take my word for it....no use
wasting that expensive college education my parents bought for me many years
ago. This is garbage that shouldn't be confused with anything that was
accurately reported.

George Z.



"meport" wrote in message
news:54n%b.21302$W74.6219@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
> In yesterdays report to Congress, the proposal by the Federal Reserve
> Chairman to reduce the federal defecate by eliminating Veterans Benefits and
> Military Retirement payments was not as well reported as the proposal to
> eliminate Social Security.
>
> But on page 17 of his report to Congress, which is published in the
> Congressional Record, Chairman Alan Greenspan clearly stated that Veterans
> Benefits and Military Retirement Payment costs are "a future time economic
> timebomb waiting to explode in the face or our struggling economy". He goes
> on to say "future growth trends, when amatorized over economic forecasting
> modles which include the modalities and mortality projections of longevity
> for the classification and subclassification studies involving the targeted
> and marginal targeted groups clearly show a upward trend toward increased
> demographic projected requirements for primary and secondary application and
> request for primary, secondary and tercurary service that clearly cannot be
> sustained unless there is a subjective application of studies to determine
> the effects of current programs projections with future statically
> modalities".
>
> He then goes on to say "not having had the good fortune to have had the
> opportunity to be included in one of the demographic groupings given the
> good fortune to have had opportunity to be included in the demographic group
> that had the good fortune and had the opportunity to be included in the
> demographic group that was chosen to be the group that had the opportunity
> to be included in one of the groups that were chosen to serve, I can look at
> this issue from a subjective prospective and determine in a subjective
> manner the due course for future projections and applications based on the
> application of modality tends and forecasts".
>
> We better start writing our Congressmen and Congresswomen, quick. Looks
> like we're the next target
>
> --
> If you get what you want, what's to stop you
> from asking for more?
>
>

"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
news:103sk3444r0e2a@corp.supernews.com...
> If you want some credibility////drivelsnipped////


Ah go piss in the wind you gassy old windbag.

And did you take your wife to lunch today or did you sit your
fat ass in front of the computer all day????????


George Z.

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:06:57 GMT, "meport"
wrote this crap:

>In yesterdays report to Congress, the proposal by the Federal Reserve
>Chairman to reduce the federal defecate by eliminating Veterans Benefits and
>Military Retirement payments was not as well reported as the proposal to
>eliminate Social Security.


Greenspan didn't propose eliminating Social Security, dumbass.

[all other crap deleted]



Horvath@Horvath.net

This signature is now the ultimate power in the universe

No, the spelling is correct. Exactly as written.

--
If you get what you want, what's to stop you
from asking for more?

"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
news:103sk3444r0e2a@corp.supernews.com...
> If you want some credibility, you need to stop posting stuff that contains
> quotes from supposedly educated people that contain so many misspelled
words
> that hardly any high school graduate couldn't do a better job of spelling.
The
> report you quoted looks like it came from a bunch of kids in grade school
who
> haven't yet learned how to spell "cat" without using a "k".
>
> What am I talking about?
>
> How about using the word "defecate" (which means to shit) instead of
"deficit"?
> How about "amatorized" (which isn't even in my dictionary in any form)
instead
> of "amortized"?
> How about "tercurary" (which also isn't in my dictionary) instead of
"tertiary"?
> How about "statically" instead of "statistically"?
>
> That's just spelling errors.
>
> Then you get into the second paragraph that includes the following:
>
> "not having had the good fortune to have had the
> opportunity to be included in one of the demographic groupings given the
> good fortune to have had opportunity to be included in the demographic
group
> that had the good fortune and had the opportunity to be included in the
> demographic group that was chosen to be the group that had the
opportunity
> to be included in one of the groups....."
>
> That's a bunch of meaningless gobbledegook that no member of the Fed would
ever
> let get into a piece of correspondence going anywhere away from his desk.
>
> Then you get into people allegedly using language that they clearly don't
> understand and have misused.
>
> This is clearly the product of a bunch of intellectual children who put
together
> stuff they didn't even understand themselves in the hopes that we're all
so dumb
> as to think that it came out of the Federal Reserve Board.
>
> In short, a total bunch of childish bullshit. Take my word for it....no
use
> wasting that expensive college education my parents bought for me many
years
> ago. This is garbage that shouldn't be confused with anything that was
> accurately reported.
>
> George Z.
>
>
>
> "meport" wrote in message
> news:54n%b.21302$W74.6219@newsread1.news.atl.earth link.net...
> > In yesterdays report to Congress, the proposal by the Federal Reserve
> > Chairman to reduce the federal defecate by eliminating Veterans Benefits
and
> > Military Retirement payments was not as well reported as the proposal to
> > eliminate Social Security.
> >
> > But on page 17 of his report to Congress, which is published in the
> > Congressional Record, Chairman Alan Greenspan clearly stated that
Veterans
> > Benefits and Military Retirement Payment costs are "a future time
economic
> > timebomb waiting to explode in the face or our struggling economy". He
goes
> > on to say "future growth trends, when amatorized over economic
forecasting
> > modles which include the modalities and mortality projections of
longevity
> > for the classification and subclassification studies involving the
targeted
> > and marginal targeted groups clearly show a upward trend toward
increased
> > demographic projected requirements for primary and secondary application
and
> > request for primary, secondary and tercurary service that clearly cannot
be
> > sustained unless there is a subjective application of studies to
determine
> > the effects of current programs projections with future statically
> > modalities".
> >
> > He then goes on to say "not having had the good fortune to have had the
> > opportunity to be included in one of the demographic groupings given the
> > good fortune to have had opportunity to be included in the demographic
group
> > that had the good fortune and had the opportunity to be included in the
> > demographic group that was chosen to be the group that had the
opportunity
> > to be included in one of the groups that were chosen to serve, I can
look at
> > this issue from a subjective prospective and determine in a subjective
> > manner the due course for future projections and applications based on
the
> > application of modality tends and forecasts".
> >
> > We better start writing our Congressmen and Congresswomen, quick. Looks
> > like we're the next target
> >
> > --
> > If you get what you want, what's to stop you
> > from asking for more?
> >
> >
>
>

"meport" wrote in message
news:VsF%b.23153$W74.556@newsread1.news.atl.earthl ink.net...

> No, the spelling is correct. Exactly as written.

In that case, I can only conclude that not a word of it came out of the Federal
Reserve Board in spite of somebody claiming that it did. I know that the Fed
couldn't possibly be that sloppy, either now or ever. You want to take it as
the gospel, be my guest....I can't.

George Z.

"George Z. Bush" wrote in message
news:103ul0mqcr4p6d5@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "meport" wrote in message
> news:VsF%b.23153$W74.556@newsread1.news.atl.earthl ink.net...
>
> > No, the spelling is correct. Exactly as written.
>
> In that case, I can only conclude that not a word of it came out of the
Federal
> Reserve Board in spite of somebody claiming that it did. I know that the
Fed
> couldn't possibly be that sloppy, either now or ever. You want to take it
as
> the gospel, be my guest....I can't.
>
> George Z.
>


That would be an accurate conclusion. The Congressional Record which our
friend from Maine refers to, is the official record of the proceedings and
debates of the United States Congress. It does not include matters handled
in committee which are published separately.

Alan Greenspan testified before the House Budget Committee on February 25,
2004 - a review of his testimony fails to support the claim of the
originator of this thread that Greenspan ever made such a statement
http://www.house.gov/budget/hearings...tmnt022504.htm

In fact - for an accurate view of the current administrations policy
regarding it's veterans, one should look at the testimony of Anthony
Principi, Secretary of Veterans Affairs. This testimony was before the same
House Budget Committee on February 12, 2004 and may be found at
http://www.house.gov/budget/hearings...tmnt021204.htm

To sum up - one should probably view anything the originator of this thread
writes with a great deal of caution - after all, he doesn't even know how to
check Senator Kerry's record on the introduction of bills in the Senate.

--
Nigel Brooks