Food For Thought?

[HARDCORE]

I just heard on the tube where the prosecution in the ?Peterson Case? is now claiming that the murder was a result of strangulation?! If this is the case, is not strangulation usually a result of instantaneous rage and not prior planning? And is not a vicious act such as this, (usually) accompanied by a struggle and massive amounts of noise and damage? ?But ah, says the prosecution, a date rape drug was used and the victim was unable to resist,? at least according to the media?!

Again, I know not if Scott Peterson committed this heinous crime, and if he did - he should pay the price! But come on fellas, (both sides) don?t create the script to fit the day, as you go along!?

VERITAS

[1IDVET]

Kind of hard to prove strangulation without a head isn't it?
Toxicology report?

This just in: Laci Peterson was drowned prior to decapitation!
(Just a bit of sarcasm here).

[HARDCORE]

Of course it is only my opinion, but I believe that the constabulary (police) and prosecution are reaching for straws in the Peterson case! I firmly believe, regardless of guilt or innocence, that much of the prosecution's thrust is geared toward paranoia, and is an attempt to get Peterson to break down and admit guilt?!

"We shall see what we shall see?!"