Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size
Login

Military Photos



Current poll results


Would a pre-emptive strike against Iraq be ethical?

Yes74 %74 %74 % 74.59 % (135)
No14 %14 %14 % 14.36 % (26)
I do not know5 %5 %5 % 5.52 % (10)
I have no opinion1 %1 %1 % 1.66 % (3)
Other, please list in comments3 %3 %3 % 3.87 % (7)

Total votes: 181
One vote is allowed per day

[ Voting booth | Other polls ]

Comments

Display Order
Re: Would a pre-emptive strike against Iraq be ethical?
by Anonymous
on Nov 02, 2002
A pre-emptIVE strike is always ethical if, and only if, one knows what one is pre-emptING.
So, is it going to be because of: "regime change", "rogue state", "weapons of mass destruction", "threats against one's family and a former President", "harboring/training Al Qaeda", "genocidal dictatorship", "control of petroleum", "axis of evil", "inherent danger to our regional allies", "friendly with O. Bin Laden", "violation of U.N. resolutions", "complicity in 9/11", "threats/attacks against Israel/Kurds/Iranians", "absence of democracy", "failure of the containment policy", "unfinished business", "support for PLO/Hamas/Jihad", "our national interests" or what/which? And, if it is to be all of the above, then what is the sudden (i.e. mission creep) urgency to do a job that should have been done ten years ago! Smells and looks bad...as it has been explained up to the present time.

Bluehawk

Re: Would a pre-emptive strike against Iraq be ethical?
by Anonymous
on Nov 02, 2002

Air, sea (blockade and missile/gunfire) and Spec ops, but I don't support a sustained ground offensive (which we could win) that leaves us in nominal control of a country whose political system is still based on tribal might and religious right! We want to find a few bad guys not a colony. Having said that, if war is declared, I'ld back our troops all the way, but I doubt I'ld vote for Bush in '04.


Re: Would a pre-emptive strike against Iraq be ethical?
by Anonymous
on Nov 05, 2002
ETHICS - WAR. Didn't know they were compatable!!!!!
SF
NC

Re: Would a pre-emptive strike against Iraq be ethical?
by Anonymous
on Nov 09, 2002
Whether or not it would be ethical will depend on what the (TRUE) ultimate goals are and whether or not we are willing to see it through until the desired objective is obtained.

If our troops are sent into Iraq, "ALL" Americans must support them 100%! They will need it and will definitely deserve it!

Tobe

Re: Would a pre-emptive strike against Iraq be ethical?
by Anonymous
on Nov 10, 2002
Though none except those who are in direct command right now know all the details of troop strength and placement, it is a sure bet that most of our soldiers, sailors and marines and equipment that will be needed for an invasion of Iraq are either already in place surrounding Saddam Hussein's regime, or are on the way. It is inconceivable to imagine that the american government would have gone to this enormous expense without having long ago decided the intention of carrying out SOME sort of a complete mission there, pre-emptive or otherwise. Even if the present Iraqi regime capitulated to the letter of the most recent UN resolution, those troops and equipment will be in theatre for a long time to come and, lest anyone forget, our people are already fighting not too far away.
The battlefields of half the world are populated with the graves of those whose sacrifices were asked by and given to the United States government, on behalf of us all. A pre-emptive strike would have to be followed up by an assault, to the end if at all this
time. Should that occur, it will require that all of us do as so many here suggest to be fully conscious of and supportive to every single service member at home or in the field, all the time, beginning now...whether the war is just or unjust, successful or not. Those troops have no choice, nor do we any longer (if anyone thought we ever did). And, in this case, what is more is that when and if our people finish up that mess, there will be repercussions all over the globe necessitating of them and us a form of endurance we may never have had to produce in the past, possibly for generations if not for centuries to come. EVERY day, is Veterans Day.
Bluehawk

Re: Would a pre-emptive strike against Iraq be ethical?
by Anonymous
on Nov 13, 2002
Ethical schmethical. What's ethical about war? Where are the ethics in killing your sworn enemies before they kill you? If one side in a conflict refuses to "paly by the rules", you throw the rules out the damn window!

The Old Sarge

Only logged in users are allowed to comment. register/log in
Military History
Forum Posts

Military Polls

Which country poses the greatest terror threat to the United States?

[ Results | Polls ]

Votes: 150

This Day in History
1861: Special commissioner Albert Pike completes treaties with the members of the Choctaw and Chickasaw Tribes, giving the new Confederate States of America several allies in Indian Territory.

1943: One of the greatest clashes of armor in military history takes place as the German offensive against the Russian fortification at Kursk, a Russian railway and industrial center, is stopped in a devastating battle, marking the turning point in the Eastern front in the Russians favor.

1950: In a series of desperate battles, the 21st Infantry Regiment fought delaying actions from Chonui to Chochiwon. Not only did the two under strength rifle battalions of the "Gimlet" Regiment delay two of the best North Korean Peoples Army divisions, but they turned in the best battle performance of U.S. troops in the war to that date.

1950: The first Distinguished Service Cross of the Korean War was awarded posthumously to Colonel Robert R. Martin who single-handedly attacked an enemy tank with a rocket launcher. Martin had just arrived in Korean and had been commander of the battered 34th Infantry Regiment of the 24th Infantry Division for one day when he was killed in action on July 8.

1965: U.S.M.C. Lt. Frank Reasoner of Kellogg, Idaho, leading the Viet Cong ambush Company A of the 3rd Reconnaissance Battalion is the the first Marine to win the Medal of honor during the Vietnam War.

1966: The National Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy (SANE) and American socialist Norman Thomas appeal to North Vietnamese President Ho Chi Minh for better treatment of captured American pilots.