There are 992 users online
You can register for a user account here.
![]() ![]()
Login
Military Photos
Main Menu
Online
Past Articles
Military Quotes
There are but two powers in the world, the sword and the mind. In the long run the sword is always beaten by the mind. -- Napoleon Bonaparte |
Current poll resultsHas military leadership done enough to protect our troops in post war Iraq?
Total votes: 168 |
Military History
Forum Posts
This Day in History
1758:
British forces capture Frances Fortress of Louisbourg after a seven-week siege.
1759: The French relinquish Fort Ticonderoga in New York to the British under General Jeffrey Amherst. 1790: An attempt at a counter-revolution in France is put down by the National Guard at Lyons. 1794: The French defeat an Austrian army at the Battle of Fleurus, France. 1848: The French army suppresses the Paris uprising. 1861: George McClellan assumes command of the Army of the Potomac after the disaster at Bull Run five days prior. 1863: Confederate cavalry leader John Hunt Morgan and 360 of his men are captured at Salineville, Ohio, during a spectacular raid on the North. 1912: The first airborne radio communications from naval aircraft to ship is conducted. 1917: Repeated German attacks north of the Aisne and at Mont Haut are repulsed. 1941: President Franklin Roosevelt seizes all Japanese assets in the United States in retaliation for the Japanese occupation of French Indo-China. |
Comments
I believe too many soldiers are dying in post war Iraq. Why don't we set up secured posts and send the Iraqis out to do their own post war dirty work?
The only failure of any protection is purely domestic American politics. Nothing else. Our troops are still dying and at risk in Iraq because U.S. government leadership has not achieved IT'S own objectives, whatever those may be. Our people have no business being there at all. The dictator is overthrown, the oil can flow and there is no way our troops will ever be able to keep the factions from killing one another whether we are there militarily or not. The least that should happen immediately is for our government to ask and accept the willingness of NATO and U.N. forces to get in there and help out.
I find it interesting that there is no uproar from the NRA to ensure the right of Iraqis to keep and bear arms over there, since what our government says Iraq needs is an American-style democracy.
If our troops left Iraq tomorrow, the citizens of that nation would find a way to clean up the mess on their own, a lot of American lives and treasury would be saved, and we could get on with more important matters.
Bluehawk
Just like Viet Nam. You guys will pull our asses out and get no credit. There is no sense in war. You are pawns. This is a time for peace. You have your yin and yan. pick a side. I think yin. There is no smoking gun. Have we been misled again??????????????????????????????/
They have a negative learning curve.
This administration has 'moved on', just like with Afganistan....Those brave men and women need our support and loyality, but most of all, they need us to voice to our leaders, that it is time to get them out and let the UN take over!
While governments diddle around creating a type of democracy and economy to their liking in Iraq (and elsewhere), our military is expected to donate their lives.
Bravely, honorably, faithfully they will.
To what end.
Bluehawk
I think there is not enough unity of command between State and Defense.
They both have their own thoughts and reasons for handling Iraq.
I think there should only be one chef in this kitchen.
In my opinion, it should have stayed DOD until the infrastruture was back up to an acceptable level, then handed over to State for the diplomatic side of this.
As for the commanders on the ground, I don't think that they are the issue.
I'm probably wrong about this comment, but I was sort of thinking things should be the OTHER way around these days in Iraq. What I mean to say is, it seems that now that the war itself is basically over, then the DOD should get the heck out of there and let the State Department handle these political negotiations going on every day. I just don't see much reason for anything else unless DOD would want to put in a whole bunch MORE troops to cover every street corner...and get things to a point where our people have enough cover, not keep getting picked off one at a time like they are. Our people have done an incredible job there, all of them. I really believe that our military has been sucked in to serving as police while, as you point out, DOD and State are matching wits behind the scenes...just like Vietnam?
Only logged in users are allowed to comment. register/log in