There are 141 users online
You can register for a user account here.
![]() ![]()
Login
Military Photos
Main Menu
Online
Past Articles
Military Quotes
In war the will is directed at an animate object that reacts. -- Karl von Clausewitz |
Current poll resultsIs the U.S. military relying too heavily on National Guard and Reserve forces?
Total votes: 108 |
Military History
Forum Posts
This Day in History
1508:
Maximilian I assumes imperial title without being crowned.
1789: George Washington, the commander of the Continental Army during the Revolutionary War, is unanimously elected the first president of the United States by all 69 presidential electors who cast their votes. 1847: General Sterling Price and his troops attack the fortified Taos Pueblo being held by revolting Pueblo Indians and firebrand Hispano nationalists with 2 hours of cannonade. 1861: Representatives from 13 Northern and 7 border states hold a Peace Convention in Washington in an attempt to avoid civil war. 1861: The Confederate States of America are born when the Provisional Congress convenes in Montgomery, Alabama. 1899: After an exchange of gunfire, fighting breaks out between American troops and Filipinos near Manila, sparking the Philippine-American War. 1915: Germany decrees British waters as part of the war zone; all ships to be sunk without warning. 1923: French troops take the territories of Offenburg, Appenweier and Buhl in the Ruhr as a part of the agreement ending World War I. 1938: Hitler seizes control of the German army & puts Nazis in key posts. 1941: The United Service Organization (U.S.O.) is formed to cater to armed forces and defense industries. |
Comments
The professionalISM of the guard and reserves is, so far as I am aware, absolutely above reproach... but does it not seem then that they are acting in the capacity of full-time reserves and guard? It is a lot to expect of anyone to try and operate a business or hold down a job, pay mortgages and credit debt (which is endlessly being encouraged for people to bring upon themselves), serve their communities in churches and volunteer roles, and keep the sanctity of marriages and children functioning as it should AND be expected to offer their lives open-endedly in defense of our national freedom anywhere in the world with little notice.
If memory serves correctly, from reading posts on PF over a lot of time, the laws which protect the private lives of reserves and guard are not what they should be so as to make this increased role they are playing in national defense possible without some very destructive consequences.
Maybe we are just reaching toward a new threshhold of awareness that their role has changed in terms of force deployment, and for that reason we might expect the laws to change accordingly and help those people either HAVE truly secure lives at home, or handle their activated service differently so as to reflect a mission nobody expected would ever occur.
When I speak of "the laws which protect the lives of reserves and guard"... what I am referring to is those laws and arrangements between government and private enterprise which have such restricted limitations upon them as to be initially good and fine but in the end not nearly enough... examples would be the length of time a reserve or guard IS actually allowed to be away from their job before pay and other benefits cease or are severly curtailed, and the ACTUAL length of time credit debt is forgiven or held off AND at what cost, matters such as that, about which I am no expert.
Freedom isn't Free, well it's about time some start paying for it!
Yes!! As a former reservist, I know the feeling of being activated and taken from civilian life. The guard and reserve should only be activated in the event of a "declared" war, not for a war of choice. Business people in my unit lost their means of making a living for the families. Our Christmas collections went to families in our unit. I could not make my house or other payments on active duty. When I got out, I owed more than when I went on active duty. The guard and reserves have been used far too much over the last 9 years. There should be a draft and the national guard and reserves should be used only when our country is in a necessary war. They should not be used for multiple tours of duty in a war zone. The active duty troops should be beefed up so that they will not be called upon to be in perpetual peril. Active duty troops should be paid for substantially more money. Our troops put their lives on the line every day in a war zone, and although they get combat pay, it is not enough.
Only logged in users are allowed to comment. register/log in