Decrease Font Size Increase Font Size
Login

Military Photos



Online
There are 136 users online

You can register for a user account here.
Library of Congress

Military Quotes

The difficulty of tactical maneuvering consists in turning the devious into the direct, and misfortune into gain.

-- Sun Tzu

Current poll results


Should people born outside of the U.S. have a right to run for President?

Yes4 %4 %4 % 4.48 % (6)
No92 %92 %92 % 92.54 % (124)
I do not know2 %2 %2 % 2.24 % (3)
I have no opinion0 %0 %0 % 0.00 % (0)
Other, please list in comments0 %0 %0 % 0.75 % (1)

Total votes: 134
One vote is allowed per day

[ Voting booth | Other polls ]

Comments

Display Order
Re: Should people born outside of the U.S. have a right to r
by GoldenDragon
on Dec 07, 2004
Commander-in-chief born in America?
Sure, that would be a major consideration but essential and required for candidacy? No.
If the person has proven his or her devotion to freedom and liberty of America and to it?s people then they should be allowed to run for the office and let the electorate make the decision if they are the best choice.
Under today?s law the current Governor of California is not qualified to run for the highest office in the land but the citizens of California thought that he was qualified enough to run that left coast state.
Should someone who left a land that was committed and diametrically opposed to the American way of democracy be able to run for office? If that person showed they had not forsaken their old countries ways, advocated that America change the way it governs it?s people and championed their previous countries way of governing then the American people are wise enough to make a wise decision at the poles. We have not elected a Communist Party candidate yet and I do not believe that we will in my lifetime but the American Communist Party is still able to enter a candidate. Now, is that stupid or not?
I personally don?t believe that someone who has publicly spoken out against America and the American way of defending its freedoms should be President, but I?ll decide that at the poles and they have every rite to waste their time and money in running for office. If they have spoken out against our armed forces during a time of war, and made that redirect in front of the enemy then I think that they should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and are guilty of ?high crimes and misdemeanors? and therefore disqualified from running for public office. If they are native born Americans then they should be prosecuted in the American judicial system. If they are not native born Americans then they should be deported.
Americans are ninety-nine and forty-four one hundreds percent not stupid and therefore capable of making wise decisions no matter where that decision was born.

Only logged in users are allowed to comment. register/log in
Military History
Forum Posts

Military Polls

In light of current and foreseeable conflicts is it wise to continue with base closures?

[ Results | Polls ]

Votes: 243

This Day in History
1814: A British squadron captures U.S. gunboats in the Battle of Lake Borgne.

1863: Confederate General James Longstreet attacks Union troops at Beans Station, Tenn.

1906: The first U1 submarine is brought into service in Germany.

1939: The League of Nations, the international peacekeeping organization formed at the end of World War I, expels the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics in response to the Soviets invasion of Finland on October 30.

1941: German Field Marshal Wilhelm Keitel orders the construction of defensive positions along the European coastline.

1944: The Rank of Fleet Admiral, U.S. Navy (five star admiral) is established.

1950: The Navy announced the successful withdrawal of U.N. forces from Chinnampo. Approximately 7,000 soldiers and civilian refugees were evacuated from the Pyongyang area.

1960: A U.S. Boeing B-52 bomber sets a 10,000-mile non-stop record without refueling.

1961: Kennedy announces intent to increase aid to South Vietnam.

1964: In Laos, Operation Barrel Roll, the name given to the first phase of the bombing plan approved by President Lyndon B. Johnson on December 1, begins with U.S. planes attacking "targets of opportunity" in northern Laos.